FREEDOM IS NATURAL …

Biniam Yibaleh BinIAM
3 min readJan 26, 2023

By Biniam YIBALEH

Freedom must have limits, there is no freedom for anyone when everyone can do whatever they want without consequences. We should strive to have freedom under the law.

„Freedom“ is a phenomenon in the natural world. This phenomenon – & indirectly also the question of free will – is examined on the basis of various system-theoretical ideas. It is argued that freedom can only arise in partially determinate and partially contingent systems & that freedom is a matter of degree. The article considers types of freedom & their possibility conditions in simple living systems & in complex living systems with modeling (cognitive) subsystems. In simple living systems, types of freedom include independence from fixed materiality, inner rather than outer purpose, unblocked & integral activity, & the ability to choose or change environmental constraints. In complex living systems there is freedom in the satisfaction of lower-level needs, which allows for the realization of higher potentials. Different types of freedom also manifest themselves in the formative subsystems of these complex systems: in overcoming automatism in subjective experience, in reason as an instrument of passion, but also in reason, which dominates passion, in independence from information Colonization by the environment and in the mobility of attention. Taking into account the diverse freedoms in simple and complex living systems enables an all-round view of this diverse and important natural phenomenon.

References

Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall LTD.

Book. Google Scholar

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: Bantam Books.

Google Scholar

Bennett, J. G. (1961). The dramatic universe: The foundations of moral philosophy (Vol. 2). London: Hodder & Stoughton.

Google Scholar

Bennett, J. G. (1966). The dramatic universe: Man and his nature (Vol. 3). London: Hodder & Stoughton.

Google Scholar

Dennett, D. (2003). Freedom evolves. New York: Viking.

Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M. (1994). The quark and the jaguar. Adventures in the simple and the complex. New York: W. H. Freeman & Co.

Google Scholar

Hume, D. (1739/2007). Treatise on human nature. In D. F. Norton & M. J. Norton (Eds.), Treatise on human nature: A critical edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Google Scholar

Jonas, H. (1966). The phenomenon of life: Towards a philosophical biology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Google Scholar

Kauffman, S. (1998). International conference on complex systems, Boston.

Kauffman, S., & Johnsen, S. (1991). Coevolution to the edge of chaos: Coupled fitness landscapes, poised states, and co-evolutionary avalanches. In C. G. Langton, C. Taylor, J. D. Farmer, & S. Rasmussen (Eds.), Artificial life II. SFI studies in the sciences of complexity (Vol. 10). Redwood City: Addison-Wesley.

Google Scholar

Krippendorff, K. (1986). Information theory: Structural models for qualitative data. Beverly Hills: Sage.

Book. Google Scholar

Langton, C. (1991). Life at the edge of chaos. In C. G. Langton, C. Taylor, J. D. Farmer, & S. Rasmussen (Eds.), artificial life II. SFI studies in the sciences of complexity. Redwood City: Addison-Wesley.

Google Scholar

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370 – 396.

Article. Google Scholar

Peirce, C. S. (1991). Peirce on signs: Writings on semiotic. In H. James (Ed.). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Rosen, R. (1991). Life itself: A comprehensive inquiry into the nature, origin, and fabrication of life. New York: Columbia University Press.

Google Scholar

Schultz, D., Wolynes, P. G., Ben Jacob, E., & Onuchic, J. N. (2009). Deciding fate in adverse times: sporulation and competence in bacillus subtilis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106, 21027 – 21034.

Article. Google Scholar

Tononi, G. (2008). Consciousness as integrated information: A provisional manifesto. The Biological Bulletin, 215, 216 – 242.

Article. Google Scholar

von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. New York: Wiley.

Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. London: Blackwell Publishing.

Google Scholar

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338 – 353.

Article. Google Scholar

Zwick, M. (1978). Quantum measurement and Gödel’s proof. Speculations in Science and Technology, 1(2). http://www.sysc.pdx.edu/download/papers/godel1.pdf

Zwick, M. (2007). Spinoza and Gödel: Causa Sui and undecidable truth. North American Spinoza Society Monograph, 13, 46 – 52. http://www.pdx.edu/sites/www.pdx.edu.sysc/files/sysc_zwick_spinoza_godel.pdf

--

--

Biniam Yibaleh BinIAM

So there is no new truth but only a fresh revelation of ancient truth, as she testified in..Tel +4915127979800 #ጉግል #BinIAM #YibALeh #ቢንያም nEvEr rUn nEvEr StaY.